Arguing is a common human behavior that involves presenting a case, defending it, and persuading others to accept it. An arguer is someone who engages in this behavior, using logic, reason, and evidence to support their position. In this article, we will explore the definition and meaning of arguer, its origin, associations, synonyms, antonyms, and example sentences.
An arguer is a person who argues or engages in argumentation. Argumentation is the process of presenting a claim or position and supporting it with evidence and reasoning. Arguers may use different tactics, such as persuasion, debate, or discussion, to convince others of their point of view.
The word arguer comes from the French word “arguer” meaning “to accuse or blame.” It was first recorded in the English language in the 16th century.
Meaning in different dictionaries
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, an arguer is “a person who argues, especially in a formal debate or discussion.” Merriam-Webster defines an arguer as “one who argues or debates.” The Cambridge Dictionary defines an arguer as “someone who argues, especially in a formal situation.”
Arguers are often associated with being persuasive, logical, and articulate. They may also be seen as argumentative, confrontational, or aggressive, depending on their approach and style of argumentation.
Synonyms for arguer include debater, disputant, advocate, champion, orator, and speaker.
Antonyms for arguer include listener, follower, agreeable, passive, and compliant.
The same root words
Words with the same root as arguer include argument, argumentative, and argumentation. These words all relate to the act of presenting and defending a case or position.
- The arguer presented a compelling case for why the company should invest in renewable energy.
- The two arguers engaged in a heated debate over the merits of capitalism versus socialism.
- The arguer’s persuasive skills convinced the jury to acquit the defendant of all charges.
- The arguer’s aggressive tone and confrontational style turned off many of the audience members.
- The arguer’s logical reasoning and evidence-based arguments won over even the most skeptical of the judges.