Antilogistic is a term that is not commonly used in everyday conversation, but it has its significance in the field of philosophy and logic. In this article, we will explore the definition, meaning, origin, and associations of antilogistic.
Definitions
Antilogistic refers to an argument that contradicts or opposes another argument. It is used to describe a statement or a proposition that is contrary to the principles of logic. In philosophy, antilogistic is used to refer to a type of fallacy where two opposing arguments are presented as equally valid.
Origin
The word antilogistic comes from the Greek word “antilogia,” which means contradiction or opposition. The term was first used in the 17th century in the context of logic and philosophy.
Meaning in different dictionaries
The meaning of antilogistic can vary depending on the dictionary you consult. However, most dictionaries define antilogistic as an argument that contradicts or opposes another argument.
Associations
Antilogistic is associated with the field of philosophy and logic. It is used to describe a type of fallacy where two opposing arguments are presented as equally valid. Antilogistic is also associated with critical thinking and the ability to identify flawed arguments.
Synonyms
Some synonyms of antilogistic include contradictory, opposing, conflicting, and paradoxical.
Antonyms
Some antonyms of antilogistic include logical, coherent, consistent, and valid.
The same root words
Some words that share the same root as antilogistic include antilogarithm, antilogism, and antilogical.
Example Sentences
- The antilogistic argument presented by the opposition was easily refuted by the logical reasoning of the speaker.
- The antilogistic nature of the debate made it difficult for the audience to determine which argument was more valid.
- The antilogistic fallacy is a common mistake made by those who lack critical thinking skills.